Hello guys, i´m new here and have a question about the contribution amount. Will this be fixed for every investor so everyone could get a place in the sale ? I think the people who believed earlier in this project won´t get an advantage right ? Best Regards, Bitsurfer7
thought it would be appropriate to follow Brians instruction to post questions here to get answers. Im asking today if there will be a token wrap up to show how much was raised and how many contributed at each level. TY
This proposal is to reduce the current impact of certification to 10 from 30. The highest rep achievable without certification is 39, and the voting weight that goes with it is 0.04. That means 5 members with the highest possible rep would outweigh 15 members with the highest possible rep without certification. Per @deniswallez With $15 and a positive conduct, you already have a reputation of 40 (hence above my 33), and therefore more voting power than me, even if you never took the time to...
Actually, Narrative has shown that it is out to reward hardworking content creators as well as other Narrators that involve in other activities in the site. However, the present reward system will kill Narrative. Some might find it hard to agree with. Yes, Narrative has its specifications and what it is here to achieve but just like Lunyr which I am one of the contributors before the site lost its value even the token. If in this platform, Narrators can earn instant reward for their comments...
Hi @Bitsurfer7 ! Welcome! The max contributions for the public sale are here on the token sale page: https://tokensale.narrative.network/ . We recently lowered the max numbers so that more people would be able to participate in the public sale; we want everyone to have a chance.
Hello, @freedom . I had a similar concern when my cred/rep is only 43 and a colleague who just joined with absolutely NOTHING is 40. I still don't understand how that can be although it was explained. When you're part of the alpha, it seems like the score should be a tad higher for early adopters. And, heck, why do we care about scores anyway? (Because humans are competitive; I can't help myself!)
@freedom I see your point and concern. You make a good argument. However recent events on the platform have shown so early how lack of certification is encouraging people to create multiple accounts for harassment and gaming the system to their favor, or just to sabotage other genuine efforts. This makes me reluctant to weighing down on certification. Something also to consider.
I don't know @Bashar Abdullah , I've been very active on Medium for two years. They don't require certification, still multiaccounts are rare. Your fake profile would be thin, soon spotted and with low weight. It's true that they also have a reporting system, that it's not there now, and this matter, but I don't see it much used.
Yes its a great point of arguments. I think administration have noted that and they have some point like fake accounts and multiple accounts and authentic narrrator or some other issues but its better if credit points for Certification reduced by some percentage .. Let's it thrown to on the foot of narrative administration. Thanks.for throwing the issue.
To be clear, you do not have to get Certified to clear your conduct negative status. You can wait it out if you want to do so. Certification is optional. If you're already Certified and you do something to cause you to become conduct negative then you have no choice but to wait.
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .